Spiritual Assessment Tools
Mar 16th
At one of the workshops this morning, a speaker made the statement that chaplains were using scripted and particularized spiritual assessment “tools” that may project the chaplain’s assumptions and block the particular expression of the patient’s spirituality. When I sought to correct that assertion during the Q&A, I was told by one of the speakers and several members of the audience that I was incorrect.
The facts of the case are as follows. The standard definition of “spiritual assessment” used in professional healthcare chaplaincy in North America is.
A more extensive [in-depth, on-going] process of active listening to a patient’s story as it unfolds in a relationship with a professional chaplain and summarizing the needs and resources that emerge in that process. The summary includes a spiritual care plan with expected outcomes which should be communicated to the rest of the treatment team.
Fitchett, G., & Canada, A. L. (2010). The Role of Religion/Spirituality in Coping with Cancer: Evidence, Assessment, and Intervention. In J. C. Holland (Ed.). Psycho-oncology, 2nd Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
This definition clearly does not support the use of a “tool”. This does not mean that no chaplain uses a tool. It only means that this use does not conform to best practice.
There certainly is a substantial lack of clarity here.
The Joint Commission and others do suggest a spiritual assessment. They do not require over even suggest the use of a “tool” which means that the definition above works. Any groups who are requiring the use of a tool are misreading the standards.
The fact is that several institutions that I know of have received advanced accreditation in palliative care without a spiritual assessment “tool”. One of those received a perfect score.
There is a widespread misunderstanding between spiritual “screening”, “history”, and “assessment” tools. For instance, FICA and HOPE are history tools, not assessment tools. They are not recommended for use by chaplains.
At the end of the day, there is a lot of misinformation out there on this topic. I would hope that practitioners would read the regs closely and draw their own conclusions about what is and what is not actually “required”.
George Handzo, BCC, CSSBB
President, Handzo Consulting
A Quiet Place and Labyrinth Room 215
Mar 16th
This is my second AAHPM-HPNA conference and I have gravitated to the Wounded Healer talk both years. The care and treatments we provide to our patients and loved ones, can take a toll on us as providers. But as Henri Nouwen states our woundedness we can become a source of life for others.
I provide primary and specialty care to persons with ALS, their loved ones and caregivers. I have been the one to provide comfort and guidance. This year death became significant as I lost my mother three weeks ago. When loss becomes personal, everything changes. The daughter, nurse and individual all wrestled with the lack of control over all of it.
I completed a palliative care certificate course at the University of Colorado School of Nursing this past year. The academics of the course and the support of my colleagues helped me through my mother’s subsequent death. I also realized how little information on Palliative Care with Parkinson’s disease exists.
As I sit through the Plenary Session Friday morning “Our Exit Strategy: Denying Death its Strangeness” David Oliver and Debra Parker Oliver I am learning how death has become a teaching moment, at teaching us how to live.
We must take time to read, research, ask questions, reflect, pray, and support and talk to each other. Communication is the key. This George Bernard Shaw quote is at the bottom of all my e-mails: “The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has taken place.”
I never knew that Palliative Care would be my passion. But you only get one chance to die well…so let’s do it well.
Patricia Reisinger MS, CRRN, FNP, GNP
Nurse Practitioner
Spinal Cord Disorders Clinic – ALS
Denver, CO
POTENTIAL ENERGY. ACTIVATION. KINETIC ENERGY.
Mar 14th
Some time ago, my AAHPM teammate (and social media maven) Jennifer Bose asked me if I’d write a blog post on my experience at the Assembly today. I’d be lying if said I was anything less than brimming with excitement about the prospect. You see, this is my second Assembly as a member of the AAHPM staff, and my first came just about a week after I was officially hired last year. Because I was brand new, I was able to experience Denver as an attendee might. I was given cart blanche and attended whatever session or meeting I desired. I saw everything. I met everyone. It was staggering and remarkably educational.
It was also decidedly different than my experience this year.
This year, I have been static, essentially posting up permanently at the Resource Center Advocacy Kiosk (you should check it out!). And, if I’m going to be honest, I have to say that I was a little worried about how my perception of this year’s Assembly might stack up after the exhilaration of last year’s. And if I’m going to be even more honest, I was really, really worried about identifying something interesting to put in a blog post. On its face, my activity at the Assembly thus far has really just amounted to sitting on a stool, behind a desk.
Fortunately, I was reminded today why the phrase “on its face” exists. It is a nod to the simple, yet essential truth that life must be lived to be understood, a warning against prejudgment. I was shown again that this Academy and the members who volunteer their time are, fundamentally, deeply dedicated to the field. I was shown again that I am lucky to work for such a special group of people, that hospice and palliative medicine practitioners are not like other providers.
Where policy and advocacy conversations at other specialties’ annual meetings may focus on increasing reimbursement or protecting turf, HPM practitioners seem to have one, core consideration in the issues they hold dear – the quality of care and life for patients and families facing serious illness. Almost every conversation I had with Assembly attendees today focused on what can be done to increase access to hospice and palliative medicine, to assess and improve the quality of care, to express to health policymakers and health system administrators how hospice and palliative medicine is systemically beneficial, and to increase the HPM workforce. Unsurprisingly, the focus was always outward, always on the needs of others.
I feel sometimes that a part of my job is to fret. The scope of policy activity at the state and federal level is daunting, and the list of areas in which I feel a responsibility to help AAHPM members make an impact seems to grow exponentially. Maybe this is a natural feeling in the information age, with its unsettling ability to turn unknown unknowns into (the far more frightening) known unknowns, but it’s unpleasant nonetheless.
Fortunately, though, I have an antidote – action. I always feel better when we are advancing the ball on an issue. I love listening in on a Public Policy Committee call or helping a member draft a letter or developing a project outline. I love it. It is the only way to turn those known unknowns into known knowns, and working with known knowns is really the only way to get your hands around an undertaking as vast as the one facing hospice and palliative medicine.
And that’s what I saw today – I saw the genesis of that action. I saw people who have been involved in advocacy for years, people who are just beginning and filled with all the zeal you’d expect, and I saw people who are primed and already planning how they are going to step up and advocate for their field. So, even though I was static pretty much all day, I was in the middle of a huge amount of activity. It was a cycle of sorts – Potential energy. Activation. Kinetic energy.
Patrick Hermes
Manager, Health Policy & Advocacy
Release of NCP Guidelines, 3rd edition
Mar 14th
The release today of the 3rd edition of the NCP Guidelines was a wonderful occasion for everyone involved in palliative care, but especially for chaplains. While the palliative care model emphasizes all four dimensions of care- physical, emotional, social and spiritual, it is often the case that the spiritual dimension is neglected in practice. As Betty Ferrell said today, if you are not doing exceptional spiritual care, you are not doing palliative care. The point here is that lots of institutions are claiming to do palliative care without any kind of spiritual care- let alone spiritual care that could be called exceptional.
There are multiple causes of this situation. In general, health care providers are least comfortable dealing with the spiritual dimension of care. It is also clearly true that there is less evidence for the efficacy of spiritual care in the palliative care process than for any of the other domains. Finally, chaplains themselves have contributed by often being unwilling to be team players and be accountable for their practice to a team. Connie Dahlin was correct today when she emphasized the point of how training for palliative care teams has progressed by emphasizing that even chaplains now have certification in palliative care. As usual, we are the last to the party.
The new guidelines give all of us, but especially spiritual care providers, new “evidence” to support our contention that spiritual care should be a full partner in palliative care. Domain 5 which covers spiritual, religious and existential care has been vastly expanded to reflect the results of the National Consensus Project in 2009 and other efforts. The professional chaplaincy organizations in the US have responded by endorsing these guidelines. On behalf of professional chaplains and all who value the spiritual dimension of care, thanks to Betty Ferrell, Connie Dahlin, Diane Meier and the whole task force for their efforts on behalf of the care of the spirit.
George Handzo, BCC, CSSBB
Feeling Sick?
Mar 14th
I was sitting in the airport ready to board the plane to New Orleans yesterday and felt ill. OMG I realized I had been masking several symptoms for over a week. This was my first trip to NOLA I couldn’t be sick! Quickly I started web surfing for urgent cares and pharmacies near the Convention Center. All of these locations were less than a one-mile walking distance.
Concentra Urgent Care
318 Baronne Street
New Orleans, LA 70112
504-561-1051
Walgreens
900 Canal Street
New Orleans, LA 70112
504-568-1271
CVS Pharmacy
800 Canal Street
New Orleans, LA 70112
504-528-7099
I feel better now. I hope you all stay well during your visit during the AAHPM and HPNA Annual Assembly.
Patricia Reisinger, MS, CRRN, FNP, GNP
Nurse Practitioner
Spinal Cord Disorders Clinic- ALS
Denver, CO
Behind the Scenes: Lessons in Leadership, Part I: Dancing with Doctors
Mar 13th
As I write this post, the AAHPM & HPNA Annual Assembly hasn’t officially started, but I learned important lessons in leadership today. Some I anticipated – others were unexpected – but when I reflect on my day, here’s one that sticks with me (I will share another soon).
I had the opportunity to sit in on a portion of a special pre-course offering entitled, “You’re Not Just a Doctor Anymore: Finding Influence Through Effective Physician Leadership.” This session was sponsored by the AAHPM Leadership Development Committee and the American College Physician Executives (ACPE). The facilitator, Kevin O’Connor, shared a YouTube video featuring an unemployed guy named Matt who set out to do something simple – travel the world and videotape himself dancing at various locations where he visited. Matt’s 14 months and 42 country journey was later edited into a powerful 4 minutes video entitled, Where the Hell is Matt? which has now been viewed by more than 45 million people via YouTube. Since that time, he has returned to many of the same countries to dance again, this time, however, he has replaced his folksy stomp with more culturally appropriate steps taught by locals (see his 2012 video montage for more of Matt dancing, also available on YouTube).
What do Matt’s travels and this unexpected Internet dance sensation have to do with physician leadership? Quite a bit, it turns out – at least according to the pre-course participants. O’Connor suggested dance is a metaphor for leadership and influence which generated an interesting discussion among session participants. Some of the conversation centered around the following concepts and reflections:
· Doing something simple can inspire other to join in – it’s contagious
· Actions motivate; words aren’t always required
· What you set out to do may result in something positive and bigger than you imagine
· There is much to be learned from others if and when we take the time to watch and listen
This prompted further thoughts:
· Who is the “Matt” in your work environment?
· Does this person realize the impact he or she is having?
· How does this apply to the work of physicians in hospice and palliative medicine?
· Does our “happy dance” attract others? Is it sustainable? Does it inspire others to join in?
Sometimes the simple things we do reach people in ways we don’t expect. So keep on dancing.
Steve Smith, CAE
Executive Director/CEO
American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM)
Just One More Degree
Mar 13th
You’re Not Just a Doctor Anymore: The New Art of Leadership is a pre-conference workshop I had the pleasure to attend. Everything you didn’t learn in medical and nursing school you learn from Kevin O’Connor, is how it all
started. Mr. O’Conner led with a metaphor that informed and shaped the content for 5 hour session. “What a difference a degree makes! From 211 to 212, water goes from being hot to powering a train. What matters if we add an extra degree to what we do everyday? That email, conversation, or phone call…just one more degree.:”
Mr. O’Conner offered a practical approach and a reframing of mindfulness to our roles as leaders in the organizations we all serve. Not surprisingly the entire session was about relationships.
The Extra Degree Starts Here
These are my take home notes, not to be place in a folder in a box in the basement. Rather these are action points to be incorporated in my daily life and shared in this blog for others who may have like interest in this practical approach to a reframed leadership mindfulness to our own relationships and social styles; personal or professional.
1. Paraphrase as a first response. Shine your light on the other person.
2. Consider questions first before conclusions.
3. Encourage: Affirm what you heard that you liked: You know what I like about what you said… Remember you can build a fire on embers……..focus on their pilot light and perhaps it will glow more
4. Link and connect with the word “and” and not “but”. I also avoid the word “just”.
5. Respond with a thank you or a paraphrase
6. Ask and listen…..everyone loves hearing a good listener
7. Listen in meetings, pause, summarize the content and add in a new thought
8. Know, understand and align with the language of other social styles.
9. Think about the product of the product. The obvious product from the American Girl store is the doll. The
product of the product for the parent is the day of memory making with their daughter. What is the product
of the product of a palliative care consult?
10. Use emotional narrative to get around the prevailing winds of organizational talking points.
11. Demonstrate interest, support and encouragement in others.
12. Be a student and not a teacher.
This workshop has been a transformative experience that lends itself well to the practical implementation in my daily work. I welcome comments and questions about the workshop.
Cory Ingram, M.D.
Assistant Professor of Family and Palliative Medicine
Mayo Clinic, College of Medicine
Medical Director – Palliative Care
Chair of the Palliative Medicine Specialty Council
Mayo Clinic Health System
Behind the Scenes: Setting the Stage for the AAHPM & HPNA Annual Assembly
Mar 12th
Over the next few days, more than 2,400 physicians, nurses and other healthcare professionals will be descending upon “The Big Easy.” This doesn’t include exhibitors, guests and staff members who will also join us for all or some of the program.
Preparations for this conference starts more than a year in advance and onsite staging at the convention center begins days before the first attendees arrive.
So what goes on behind the scenes of the Annual Assembly? For the first time this year, a handful of AAHPM staff members will be snapping photos, sharing insights and perhaps revealing some “secrets” about how everything comes together.
I arrived on Monday afternoon with two of our exceptional “meeting planners” – Vanessa Mobley and Kelly Rostine – who plan, coordinate and oversee all of the logistics associated with the conference. This includes coordination with the hotels, convention center, caterers, registration management, a/v technicians decorators (that pipe, drape, stage and signage doesn’t just get there on its own!), hotel accommodations, receptions, concurrent and plenary rooms, exhibit hall set up and much more. The document that details all of the specification for the four day program is nearly 200 pages long. I often describe it as a “three ring circus” although truthfully, it’s more like a 12 ring circus since that’s how many educational sessions are taking place simultaneously most of the day.
Monday and Tuesday are mostly set-up days when staff begin arriving and unpack, along with the laborers, a/v and computer technicians and others responsible for setting up and supporting the conference. Here are some “behind the scene” photos of what things look like before everyone arrives. See you soon and travel safe!
Steve Smith, CAE
Executive Director/CEO
American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM)
Follow me at @ssmithaahpm

Have you ever seen an exhibit hall before the booth and carpets are put into place? Not pretty. But it will be by Wednesday night!
Shaping the Future Campaign – A Member-Driven Campaign
Feb 26th
I regard the Academy as my “professional home.” As a longtime AAHPM member, I’ve seen the Academy shape, enhance, and advance the field of hospice and palliative care and fully support its membership. The Shaping the Future campaign is no different; the funds raised will go toward programs that members themselves have requested, be it advocacy, workforce development, or education—or all three areas.
The campaign is a way to enhance the reach and depth of what the Academy can do, and be responsive to what members say is important to them and the field. Members tell us that there still a lot to be done in terms of advocacy to ensure that everybody who has a serious illness has access to high-quality palliative care. The ways to do that are to have more well-trained palliative care providers, be accessible and available to people who need care, have the reimbursement mechanisms to make it fiscally viable, and have the evidence to inform practice.
I urge all members to become actively engaged in the campaign. Every gift will make a difference.
Visit aahpm.org and click “Donate Now” on the lower left corner of the home page to make your donation today.
Jean Kutner, MD MSPH FAAHPM, of the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, is a current member of the AAHPM Board of Directors and Executive Committee, and will be President-Elect following the 2013 Annual Assembly.
Choosing Wisely in Hospice and Palliative Medicine
Feb 26th
Has this happened to you? Your elderly patient can’t sleep their last night in the hospital before being discharged home with hospice care so the on-call physician orders a sedative-hypnotic. When the patient becomes confused and agitated, a CT scan of the head is ordered. Or how about this one: Your patient with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer is referred for screening colonoscopy. I’m sure you have your own stories. Experts estimate that one third of US healthcare spending, over $700 billion annually, is for care that is non-beneficial or even harmful.
Seeing treatments and tests reflexively ordered when the potential for benefit is low or the risk of harm is high, particularly for the elderly and people living with serious illness, was a major source of distress to me as a resident. That distress, and a belief that evidence-based medicine could guide us to care that is more effective, accessible, compassionate, and sustainable, lead me to a career in palliative medicine. It is precisely this hope that underlies the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation’s Choosing Wisely® campaign.
The goal of Choosing Wisely is to challenge medical specialties to come up with their “top five” list of treatments, tests, or procedures that should be questioned because best evidence shows they are non-beneficial or even harmful. As a recovering molecular biologist, I confess, I devoutly believe that science that informs our compassionate care is the best way forward. All this is by way of explanation for the madness that overtook me when I agreed to serve as Chair of the AAHPM Choosing Wisely Task Force.
The challenge was significant. We had a relatively short timeline to build expert consensus on our list of “Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question” in Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Striving for an inclusive and transparent process, we also wished to incorporate member feedback into the list development process. Fortunately, I was blessed with a wonderfully talented group of Task Force members.
To start the process we elicited suggestions for the list from the AAHPM SIGs as well as Task Force members. We used these to develop a short list of recommendations and then sought feedback from Academy members. We received close to 700 comments from more than 300 members ―vital input that informed the Task Force’s final selection of AAHPM’s recommendations and drafting of the precise supporting language for each item on the list. Finally, last Thursday, our recommendations were revealed – along with those of sixteen other medical specialties – during a press event in Washington, DC. (Visit choosingwisely.org to access the complete lists from all participating specialty societies and watch a video of the Feb. 21 announcement and panel discussion.) Each society, traditional and social media, along with Consumer Reports, Wikipedia, AARP, NHPCO and other consumer advocates are all contributing to the broad dissemination of the campaign.
With the final list announced, the real work now begins: supporting critical conversations between physicians and their patients as they collaborate to ensure the best care possible. To support those conversations, AAHPM has developed a set of talking points for members (login to Members Only required). Our AAHPM Choosing Wisely Task Force has also written a Special Article describing our “Five Things” in greater detail. Look for it in the March issue of The Journal of Pain & Symptom Management.
I’d also like to invite you to attend the Advocacy Forum at the AAHPM & HPNA Annual Assembly in New Orleans next month where my fellow Task Force members and I will discuss our Choosing Wisely recommendations and how you might choose to discuss them with your patients and the public. (Learn more.)
I’d love to hear your thoughts about AAHPM’s Choosing Wisely recommendations. What do you think of the list? Will you use it in the care of your patients? If so, how? What other recommendations would you like to see on any future lists?
Whether or not your “Five Things” list would be identical to AAHPM’s final version, I hope you find it a useful tool to engage patients, families, and the public in choosing wisely.
Daniel Fischberg, MD, PhD
Medical Director, Pain & Palliative Care Department, The Queen’s Medical Center
Chief, Division of Palliative Medicine, and Professor, Department of Geriatric Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine of the University of Hawaii
Honolulu, HI





Recent Comments